The Middle East has long been a region of strategic importance, historically influenced by global powers, particularly the United States. However, the emergence of the BRICS bloc—comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—has sparked discussions on whether it can provide an alternative to Western dominance in the region.
In June 2023, BRICS expanded to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE as full members. This marked the first ministerial meeting of the expanded group, reflecting a significant shift in geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East, according to the Economic Times.
The Growing Influence of BRICS in the Middle East
BRICS nations, particularly China and Russia, have intensified their engagement in the Middle East over the past decade. China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has positioned it as a vital economic partner, investing heavily in infrastructure, energy, and technology. Concurrently, Russia has asserted itself as a key player in regional security, especially in Syria, where it has supported the Assad regime.
India is also enhancing its trade relations with Gulf nations, focusing on energy imports and exports. These evolving relationships offer Middle Eastern countries a diversification strategy, reducing their historical dependency on the West.
Economic Power vs. Military Presence
Despite their economic inroads, BRICS nations lack the military infrastructure that the US has established in the region, which includes long-standing military bases and deep defense ties with key allies such as Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The US continues to play a crucial role in maintaining regional security through military involvement, arms sales, and alliances with Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. This disparity underscores a significant limitation for BRICS; while they can offer economic alternatives, they do not possess the military clout to directly challenge US influence.
Energy Dynamics: A Game Changer
Energy resources remain a critical factor in the Middle East’s geopolitical landscape. As BRICS countries, particularly China and India, become more prominent buyers of Middle Eastern energy, they could offer alternatives to U.S. and Western markets, thereby increasing leverage for regional governments. Furthermore, BRICS-led initiatives like de-dollarization could shift global trade away from the U.S. dollar, diminishing American economic influence over oil markets traditionally dominated by dollar transactions.
Political Fragmentation within BRICS
While BRICS provides economic opportunities, it does not present a unified political force. Diverging interests among member countries, such as India and China’s conflicting geopolitical agendas, restrict the bloc’s ability to act cohesively in the Middle East. In contrast, U.S. alliances—though occasionally strained—are characterized by consistent relationships built on decades of cooperation.
Toward a Multipolar Future
Experts indicate that the growing influence of BRICS could signify a shift in the Middle East’s traditional reliance on U.S. dominance, but complete replacement is unlikely in the near future. Countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, newly invited members of BRICS, are leveraging their membership to diversify global relationships while navigating a more multipolar world order.
Anna Jacobs said to the Middle East Eye that Gulf states aim to balance relations with major powers to avoid being ensnared in great power competition. While they seek closer ties with China and Russia, they also prioritize maintaining security partnerships with the U.S.
Economic Motivations Behind the Shift
Analysts attribute the shifting dynamics to economic concerns. As BRICS moves towards reducing reliance on the US dollar, many Middle Eastern nations are reassessing their roles in a dollar-centric global financial system. Jalel Harchaoui from the Royal United Services Institute reports to Middle East Eye that joining BRICS allows these countries to reduce dependency on US-controlled financial systems and gain greater autonomy over their economic policies.
At the same time, experts caution that joining BRICS does not equate to abandoning ties with the West. Trita Parsi from the Quincy Institute also told the same publication that this shift reflects a desire for more balanced power structures in global politics, rather than an outright rejection of the US. The expansion of BRICS serves to create leverage and flexibility, not a full disengagement from Western powers.
If you see something out of place or would like to contribute to this story, check out our Ethics and Policy section.